MathTok

A Hybrid Canonicalized AST-Based Tokenization Framework for Mathematical Language Modeling

Python License HuggingFace Tests Research


Why MathTok?

Traditional tokenizers such as BPE and SentencePiece treat mathematical expressions as plain text sequences, fragmenting semantic structure and discarding operator hierarchy.

MathTok introduces a structure-aware tokenization pipeline that:

  • canonicalizes equivalent mathematical expressions,
  • preserves AST hierarchy,
  • encodes operator semantics explicitly,
  • improves symbolic compression efficiency,
  • and enables future tree-aware transformer architectures.

Overview

MathTok is a research-grade tokenizer pipeline that converts raw mathematical expressions (LaTeX or ASCII) into a structured, semantically-rich token stream. Unlike standard BPE or SentencePiece tokenizers, MathTok is structure-aware: it builds an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) from each expression and serializes it via DFS preorder traversal, preserving full mathematical structure.

Raw Mathematical Expression
          ↓
Canonicalization Layer       (sympy: simplify, expand, normalize)
          ↓
Hybrid Mathematical Lexer    (split TEXT / MATH spans)
          ↓
AST Generator                (SymPy tree β†’ typed ASTNode tree)
          ↓
Operator-Aware Semantic Encoder  (rich metadata per operator)
          ↓
Structural Serialization     (DFS preorder β†’ flat token stream)
          ↓
Structural Attention Metadata (per-token tree context)
          ↓
Vocabulary Mapping + BPE     (fixed math vocab + HF BPE for text)
          ↓
Compressed Token Stream

Architecture

MathTok Architecture


Installation

Clone the repository and install the package in editable mode:

git clone https://github.com/SurweeshSP/mathtok.git

cd mathtok

pip install -e ".[eval,dev]"

Quick Start

Tokenize a Mathematical Expression

Run the tokenizer pipeline directly from the command line:

python -m mathtok.pipeline "The derivative of sin(x^2) + 3x"

Example output:

[
  FUNCTION_SIN,
  VARIABLE_x,
  POWER,
  NUMBER_2,
  OP_ADD,
  NUMBER_3,
  VARIABLE_x
]

Running the Test Suite

Execute the comprehensive unit and integration test suite:

pytest tests/ -v

Current coverage includes:

  • AST generation
  • Canonicalization
  • Lexer validation
  • Pipeline integration
  • Serialization consistency
  • Structural comparison metrics

Comparative Tokenizer Evaluation

Run the full benchmark evaluation pipeline:

python -m evaluation.comparison

This benchmark compares:

  • MathTok (Hybrid AST Tokenizer)
  • GPT-2 BPE
  • SentencePiece Unigram
  • Character-Level Tokenization

Evaluation metrics include:

  • Symbolic Compression Ratio (SCR)
  • Semantic Density
  • Structural Efficiency
  • Token Fragmentation
  • Sequence Compactness

Visualization Dashboard

Generate benchmark plots and the unified evaluation dashboard:

python -m evaluation.visualize

Generated outputs include:

  • Semantic Density Comparison
  • SCR Comparison
  • Structural Efficiency Comparison
  • Token Count Analysis
  • Unified Metrics Dashboard

All generated figures are stored in:

evaluation/results/

Repository Structure

mathtok/
β”œβ”€β”€ mathtok/                 # Core tokenizer framework
β”œβ”€β”€ evaluation/              # Benchmarking and evaluation
β”œβ”€β”€ tests/                   # Comprehensive test suite
β”œβ”€β”€ assets/                  # Architecture diagrams
β”œβ”€β”€ README.md
β”œβ”€β”€ setup.py
└── pyproject.toml

Python API

from mathtok import MathTokPipeline

pipeline = MathTokPipeline()

# Encode mixed text + math (supporting LaTeX or ASCII syntax)
out = pipeline.encode("The derivative of $\\sin(x^2)$ is $2x\\cos(x^2)$.")
print(out.tokens)      # ['[MATH_START]', 'FUNC_SIN', 'OP_POW', 'VAR_X', 'CONST_2', '[MATH_END]', ...]
print(out.sexp)        # (FUNC_SIN (OP_POW VAR_X CONST_2))
print(out.input_ids)   # [4, 27, 10, 45, 12, 5, ...]

# Access structural metadata (for tree-aware attention masking)
for meta in out.metadata:
    print(meta.token, meta.depth, meta.tree_position_key)

# Pure math expression serialization
out = pipeline.encode_math_only("(x+1)^2")
print(out.sexp)        # (OP_POW (OP_ADD VAR_X CONST_1) CONST_2)

# HuggingFace-compatible tokenizer export
hf_tok = pipeline.get_hf_tokenizer()
hf_tok.save_pretrained("./mathtok-tokenizer")
result = hf_tok("x^2 + 2*x + 1", return_tensors="pt")

Research Contributions

1. Hybrid Lexer

Separates natural language from mathematical content using LaTeX delimiter detection ($...$, \(...\), \[...\]) and ASCII math heuristics.

2. Canonicalization Engine

Normalizes mathematically equivalent expressions via SymPy's simplify(), expand(), and internal representation (subtraction β†’ addition + negation, division β†’ multiplication + reciprocal).

3. AST-Based Structural Serialization

Maps SymPy's expression tree to a typed token vocabulary with semantic metadata per operator. Serializes via DFS preorder traversal.

4. Operator Semantic Registry

Every operator and function carries an explicit metadata record: arity, precedence, associativity, semantic_role. This is the primary novelty over standard tokenization.

5. Structural Attention Metadata

Per-token records encoding depth, parent_id, children_ids, tree_position_key, and sibling_count β€” enabling future structure-aware attention.

6. Two-Tier Vocabulary

  • Fixed math vocabulary: deterministic IDs for all operators, functions, variables, constants.
  • BPE text vocabulary: HuggingFace tokenizers BPE for natural language spans.

Evaluation Metrics & Benchmarks

Core Metrics

Metric Symbol Meaning
Semantic Compression Ratio SCR structural_score / token_count (Higher is better β€” measures parsed semantic content density)
Semantic Density SD math_tokens / total_tokens (Ratio of high-value math tokens, measures information density)
Structural Efficiency SE parent_child_relations / token_count (Ratio of hierarchy relationships encoded per token)
Token Stability TS 1 - CoV(token count across rewritings) (Fidelity and stability across representations)

Empirical Benchmarks (4-Way Comparison)

Below are the empirical averages computed over our comprehensive suite of 70 mathematical test expressions:

Tokenizer Mean SCR (↑ Better) Semantic Density (↑ Better) Structural Efficiency (↑ Better)
MathTok (Ours) 0.8501 0.5285 0.2339
GPT-2 BPE 0.4251 0.1838 0.1491
SentencePiece Unigram 0.3696 0.1499 0.1403
Character-Level 0.3708 0.1518 0.1518

  • MathTok achieves a 2.30x structural compression improvement over SentencePiece.
  • MathTok packs 3.52x more math-centric information per token stream compared to SentencePiece unigrams (0.5285 vs 0.1499), showing immense semantic density.
  • MathTok is 1.67x more efficient at encoding hierarchical ast relationships directly into token structures (0.2339 vs 0.1403).

High-Impact Visualizations

The visualization system runs via python -m evaluation.visualize and exports professional visual assets under evaluation/results/:

  • Unified Evaluation Dashboard (metrics_dashboard.png): 3-panel side-by-side display of SCR, Semantic Density, and Structural Efficiency.
  • Overall SCR Comparison (scr_comparison.png): Comparative summary bar chart.
  • Category-Level Breakdowns (scr_by_category.png): SCR analyzed by nested/standard categories.
  • Semantic Density Summary (semantic_density_comparison.png): Ratio of math structure to total tokens.

Project Structure

math_token/
β”œβ”€β”€ mathtok/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ canonicalizer.py      # Layer 1: Canonicalization Engine
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ lexer.py              # Layer 2: Hybrid Mathematical Lexer
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ ast_generator.py      # Layer 3: AST Generator
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ operator_registry.py  # Layer 4: Operator Semantic Registry
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ serializer.py         # Layer 5: Structural Traversal & Serialization
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ metadata.py           # Layer 6: Structural Attention Metadata
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ vocabulary.py         # Layer 7: Two-Tier Vocabulary
β”‚   └── pipeline.py           # Orchestrator Pipeline
β”œβ”€β”€ evaluation/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ metrics.py            # Definition of core evaluation metrics
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ benchmark.py          # Quick benchmarking scripts
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ comparison.py         # Full 4-way comparative framework (SentencePiece integrated)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ visualize.py          # Custom dashboard visualization engine
β”‚   └── results/              # JSON/JSONL reports & visual plots
└── tests/                    # 110+ passing unit tests

Future Work

  • Tree-aware transformer attention integration
  • Native mathematical pretraining corpus
  • Symbolic reasoning benchmarks
  • Neural theorem proving interfaces
  • Equation graph embeddings
  • Mathematical multimodal tokenization
  • Integration with Lean/Coq theorem systems

Citation

@article{surweesh2026mathtok,
  title   = {MathTok: A Hybrid Canonicalized AST-Based Tokenization Framework for Mathematical Language Modeling and Symbolic Reasoning},
  author  = {Surweesh SP},
  year    = {2026},
  journal = {Preprint},
  note    = {Open-source research framework available on GitHub and Hugging Face},
  keywords = {Mathematical Tokenization, Symbolic AI, Abstract Syntax Trees, LLMs, NLP, Mathematical Reasoning, Canonicalization},
  url     = {https://huggingface.co/Surweesh/MathTok}
}

Links

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support

Evaluation results

  • Semantic Density on Custom Mathematical Benchmark
    self-reported
    Improved
  • Structural Efficiency on Custom Mathematical Benchmark
    self-reported
    Optimized
  • SCR on Custom Mathematical Benchmark
    self-reported
    Enhanced