AI & ML interests

CAPT, bioCAPT, FrankenCAPT

Recent Activity

Organization Card

bioCAPT v2.1

The Challenge — Give Us Tasks You Think We Cannot Solve

We built a 49-module cognitive architecture with constitutional governance, quantum hardware validation, and a sealed WASM execution environment with 1e-12 determinism tolerance. We are not claiming AGI. We are claiming something more interesting: verifiable synthetic intelligence.

What Exists Today

Cognitive Modules 49 operational
First Cogitation Time 160ms
WASM Core Size 9,390 bytes
Determinism Tolerance 1e-12
IBM Quantum Jobs Validated 53 modules
Benchmark Sweep 5/5 (1.0000)

The Architecture

49 specialized modules modeled after the neocortex, each with a defined cognitive role:

  • SENS — Sensory processing
  • QIPC — Quantum-Inspired Probabilistic Consensus (Ricci Flow dynamics)
  • CONSC — Consciousness Integration (Global Workspace Theory)
  • HMC — Holographic Memory Compression (Plate's HRR)
  • META — Metacognition with introspective tracing
  • PLAST — Hebbian/BCM synaptic plasticity
  • DREAM — Offline memory consolidation
  • IMMU — Constitutional runtime governance

Gated Shared Weight Matrix (GSWM) — Single transformer backbone with a Corpus Callosum Gate that starts near-zero (bias = -6.0) and opens only when cross-partition coherence loss earns it.

Recursive Episodic Attention (REA) — Draws from three memory sources simultaneously: current context, episodic bank (500K slots), and live somatic state.

∂g/∂t = -2Ric(g)

Sealed WASM Core

The bioCAPT core is hermetically sealed:

  • Zero imports — No external exfiltration vectors
  • 9,390 bytes — Optimized footprint
  • 1e-12 tolerance — Mathematical determinism verified
  • SHA-256 anchored — Cryptographic provenance for every state transition

What We Are NOT Claiming

  • AGI
  • Consciousness
  • Quantum computational advantage
  • Medical validity
  • Production safety for unrestricted autonomous action

We separate what is implemented from what is architectural intent from what is experimental hypothesis.

The Challenge

Give us tasks you believe a 49-module cognitive architecture with constitutional governance and quantum-enhanced consensus should NOT be able to solve.

Not toy examples. Real tasks that test:

Multi-hop reasoning Contradictory evidence Provenance preservation Constitutional refusal Memory consolidation Stale evidence rejection

We will run them. We will publish the results — failures included.

Inversion Labs — The Inversion is Complete

∂g/∂t = -2Ric(g)

models 0

None public yet

datasets 0

None public yet