Papers
arxiv:2605.04676

RF-Analyzer: Can Vision-Language Models Learn RF Understanding from Synthetic Data?

Published on May 6
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Vision-language models trained on synthetic spectrogram data can generalize to real radio frequency environments for signal attribute extraction, though performance degrades without contextual priors in unseen conditions.

AI-generated summary

Understanding the wireless spectrum is a fundamen- tal requirement for intelligent communication systems, however, interpreting spectrograms requires extracting multiple physical attributes and reasoning about signal structure, which is a capability that is not achieved by traditional ML approaches. Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) demonstrated the possibility of learning such interpretation capabilities directly from data. This paper investigates whether VLMs can learn this capability from synthetic data alone, and more importantly, whether such learned representations generalize to real over-the- air RF environments. To address this question, we introduce RF-Analyzer, an SDR-to-AI analysis platform that integrates live spectrum captures associated with the corresponding VLM- based interpretation, enabling direct evaluation of VLMs outputs on live over-the-air signals. Using this platform, we assess a model trained exclusively on synthetic spectrogram data with general-purpose baselines. To enable systematic analysis, we establish a benchmark framework comprising three metrics, Physical Attribute Extraction Score (PAES), Prompt Leakage Rate (PLR), and hallucination count, to assess signal understanding and grounding. The obtained results demonstrate that VLMs trained on synthetic spectrogram data can generalize to real RF environments, particularly for extracting physical signal attributes such as spectral occupancy, temporal behavior, and SNR. This indicates that synthetic data is sufficient for learning transferable representations of RF signal structure. However, this generalization is limited due to the fact that synthetic training does not provide reliable semantic grounding without contextual priors. In particular, generalization breaks under conditions that are not covered in the synthetic distribution, particularly low-SNR regimes

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2605.04676
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.04676 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.04676 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.04676 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.